Being the underdog has its benefits. AMD’s relentless fight against Intel over the past seven years has propelled it from a second-rate CPU builder to a formidable industry titan.
However, with the release of Ryzen 9000, AMD’s latest chips feel lackluster compared to previous generations. It seems like a product line from a company playing it safe, akin to Intel’s approach.
Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Seven years of fighting
In early 2017, AMD introduced its Zen microarchitecture, a game-changer for the company. Zen marked a shift towards per-core performance, challenging Intel’s dominance in the CPU market.
AMD’s Ryzen processors, powered by Zen, exceeded expectations with a significant IPC gain of 52%, positioning AMD as a serious competitor to Intel.
Fast forward to Ryzen 9000, and the incremental performance improvements seem underwhelming compared to the groundbreaking leaps made in the past.
Two factors
Ryzen 9000 promises a modest IPC gain of 16%, leaving enthusiasts questioning the value proposition compared to previous generations. The delayed integration of 3D V-Cache further complicates the product lineup.
While 3D V-Cache technology holds promise for enhanced gaming performance, its delayed availability raises concerns about the product strategy.
Only one generation
With Ryzen 9000, AMD faces a challenge of maintaining its competitive edge amid lukewarm reviews and pricing strategies that favor last-gen offerings. The future of AMD’s CPU lineup remains uncertain, with hopes pinned on upcoming innovations like Zen 6.
